Saturday, May 18, 2013

Darwin’s Evolutionary Racism



Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.”

In 2006, I met Tom De Rosa, the Founder of Creation Studies Institute (www.creationstudies.org) – reaching the world with the truths of Creation. Supporting this godly Florida-based ministry, I receive their monthly newsletter on different facts and issues in the date between Creation and Evolution, with the true purposes and hidden agendas exposed. Being that we just watched the latest “Design of Life” Christian Science video on “Flight”, I took a look at an old publication from CSI dealing with one of these “ulterior motives” associated with the atheistic root intent to do away with the idea that man was a divinely created being with a God-given purpose. De Rosa writes that we need to realize that what we are seeing in Darwinian Evolution’s “natural selection” is a subtle form of racism being propagated in the name of “science” – falsely so-called. Charles Darwin’s book “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life” proposed that all living things are connected by common decent from a single, original organism. But who hears about his “favored races” position? Darwin’s identification of natural selection (aka survival of the fittest) as the mechanism of evolution defined a process that naturally selects individuals that have the best chance of survival due to evolved advantages. Evolutionary science is based upon inequality and promotes natural “elitism.” It states that the living world is interconnected and establishes a hierarchy with the more evolved at the top of the evolutionary ladder of death and struggle, and the less evolved at the bottom. When this principle is applied to mankind through "Social Darwinism" it results in not only a survival of the fittest mentality, but an elimination of the “least fit” – often those of another race.

Psalm 53:1The fool has said in his heart, “There is no God.” They are corrupt, and have done abominable iniquity.

Webster’s Dictionary defines evolution as “the historic development of a biological group (as a race or species) and the distinguishable differences due to modifications in successive generations.” According to evolution, a race or species achieves dominance over time by developing natural traits (inherent) that are beneficial (superior) to the survival of the favored race/species. For evolution to exist, there has to be inequality in the groups. There are the weak and the strong, the more intelligent and the feeble-minded, the more deserving and the less deserving, the “haves”, the “have nots” and those who will live and those who will die. Darwin’s willful denial of a Creator led him to create a theory that reduces mankind to a highly evolved animal that descended from ape-like ancestors in a “dog eat dog" world. Evolution demands that one kind must be better that the other, so that the strongest or most adapted wins the race for survival. It is a natural form of elitism, which when applied to humanity results in racism.

Jude 1:4For certain men have crept in unnoticed, who long ago were marked out for this condemnation, ungodly men, who turn the grace of our God into lewdness and deny the only Lord God and our Lord Jesus Christ.

When it comes to mankind, disciples of Darwin who live by his ideology cannot escape the brutal trap of his “tree of life,” and the question of which race resides on the lowest branch and which gets the top spot. In “The Descent of Man” (1871) Darwin wrote: (1) “Do the races or species of men, whichever term may be applied, encroach on and replace one another, so that some finally become extinct? We shall see that all these questions, as indeed is obvious in respect to most of them, must be answered in the affirmative, in the same manner as with the lower animals." (2) "The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, than the Caucasian, and some ape as a baboon, instead as present between the negro or Australian aborigine and the gorilla." (3) "Man has ultimately become superior to woman and attains to a higher eminence, in whatever he takes up, than woman can attain.” Darwin clearly indicates a racial and gender hierarchy. As much as evolutionists try to deny it or obscure it from view, it is evident in the plethora of Darwin’s literature that Darwin and his theory are racist. With such a racist mentality, how can so many well-respected scientists worship Darwin? And why is this the only theory of origins in our government public schools?

In Christ, Brian

6 comments:

T-Childs said...

Very good post Brian. We saw plainly in the 20th century what notions of inferior races and superior races led to, and the horror, chaos and ultimate tragedy and heartbreak that these notions caused. In England, as well as racism, we have the added prejudice of class ideology, that one is superior than someone else if one is from a higher class background. Now this isn't so much of a problem, but back in the 19th century this notion was used against people and used as an excuse to exploit and otherwise control and manipulate people simply because they were perceived to be at the lower end of the scale. All these prejudices are in direct opposition to a loving God who accepts all and created all without any kind of special status; in short, we are all special to Him, thank God!

Brian Ray Todd said...

Thanks T-Childs for the input of your study, observations and experience of the Darwin inferior verses superior races from the UK perspective (the origin of Darwin). You are right that the root problem is allegiance or opposition to a loving Creator God (belief or unbelief). The prejudges stem and grow from there as natural consequences of sinful man. recognizing the issue, making awareness for those who do not, and giving answers aligned with God's Word, Will & Way that are lived out as citizens of the Kingdom of Heaven is the goals. Christ is the remedy and the balance. Prejudges not against mankind, but for the Lord. I appreciate your comments, so thank you for writing.

I've read your last few Blogs at your site and been thinking about what you wrote also. I thank you for your ministry there in the UK that reach all the way here to me and all who read them also. Blessings.

Frank E. Blasi said...

Dear Brian,
I have come across your blog page while browsing Tim Child's blog.
I have had a deep interest in the conflict between Creationism and Darwinism going right back to 1973 the year I was converted to Jesus Christ as Saviour.
Your article on evolution being the root problem of racism is so absolutely true. Not for nothing did Adolf Hitler initiated the Holocaust, just because he believed that his Arian race were superior to the Jews.
Why not browse through my list of blogs, some dealing direct with the issue of evolution.
God bless,
Frank.

Brian Ray Todd said...

Thanks for stopping by Frank. I too have been studying the issue and debate (off and on) for years. I shall take your suggestion and check out your Blogs on Creation verses evolution. I appreciate your efforts to bring this destructive theory of evolution to light for what it truly is ... wrong and God-rejecting lies. Blessings.

Ken said...

Hi Brian,
I view evolution as the atheists hope. They so much do not want their to be a God, they have to put their hope into something foolish like evolution. Then they will defend it to the max and try to shut down anything or anyone which contradicts their theory hoping one day they will not have to stand before them.

Thank you for sharing this and also I had never heard of the ministry "Creation Studies Institute." I will have to check them out.

Blessings,
Ken

Brian Ray Todd said...

Hi Ken, You are correct that the true conflict is between belief in God and unbelief. The root problem is "Sin". We are not sinners because we sin, but we sin because we are sinners. The kingdom of Heaven has a king that makes commandments, decrees, and statutes for the subjects of His domain to trust and obey for their beloved Sovereign. And there are consequences for not trusting and obeying the King's Word. To "miss the mark" set by our Lord is called "sin" and must be punished. If there is no kingdom, then there is no king, and if there is no sovereign king then there are no commandments, decrees, or statutes that we are accountable to or can be punished for disobedience. This is the atheism great hope and as you so right stated, "have to put their hope into something foolish like macro-evolution" for the substitute explaination for the origin of life. Great point! Thank you for the comment.